Ethics in science
The scientific community has recently experienced instances of scientific fraud and misconduct. Issues with the replicability of research pose the question if science needs a new oath for ethics and research integrity. Although there are codices of good scientific practice and systems that should control them, they seem to be insufficient. Does academia need to readjust its ethical principles for research in an increasingly digital and intertwined world? How do we protect quality and reputation of science in times of scepticism towards the scientific authority? We want to reflect and discuss ethics in science. Share your thoughts about the role of existing and alternative codes of conduct. What should the ideal codices comprise? How should they be controlled? Does digitalization essentially change the concept of integrity in science and research?
What is your take on Ethics in Science? We welcome contributions on this topic.
Adopting common guidelines is not enough for setting up a system of global ethics. Miltos Ladikas explains what else is needed.
Paul Benneworth and Kate Maxwell explain why we need public funding for science that creates truly public benefits.
A perspective from Germany’s biggest network of doctoral researchers
Classical and large institutions of liberal democracy like politics and the media are increasingly less trusted. What about science?
No big news for scientists: Journalists recently uncovered a scandal surrounding predatory journals. What happened?
Wanda Jones explains how to promote good scientific practices and what universities could do to integrate them into their curricula.
Elmar Doppelfeld explains why promoting ethics in science is a challenge that must be tackled on a european level.
Bernhard Kempen illustrates calls for a bona fide treatment of data, facts, and intellectual property.
Su Golder and Gill Norman analyse the complex ethical considerations researchers face using social media data.
Annette Birkeland explains, how an efficient strategy of promoting good scientific practice should look like.
Problems with current situation of review and how to solve them
A young scholar in the fast lane. Until the crash.
Three examples for library engagement in trust: scholarly communication literacy, information quality and legal certainty.