If you published something somewhere else and now think it might fit here as well: Let us know. Crosspost are welcome and we make them citable.
As corporate investment eclipses public funding, the pursuit of scientific knowledge is increasingly guided by market logic. This shift is starkly visible in AI research, where the race towards AGI exposes how profit motives and national competition are quietly reshaping the norms and values of science itself.
The “orchestrator” design of ChatGPT-5 exemplifies how generative AI models, by becoming fluid services rather than static tools, make scientific replication impossible in principle, not just difficult in practice. Why is scientific publishing holding itself back? Pressure to publish in elite journals fuels politics, fragments fields like ecology, and weakens true peer review—could new tools help create a fairer, more objective editorial system?
In this study, Ben Shultz uncovers a sharp, politically driven collapse in academic communication about disinformation research following the 2024 U.S. election.
Teresa Völker interviewed Jeanette Hofmann about the role of science communication in fragmented publics, the impact of social media on democratic discourse, and why scientists shouldn’t retreat from social media.
Institutions often applaud public engagement, until the backlash begins. Then what? At a Berlin workshop, researchers explored how to move from awareness to action.
Subscribe to our newsletter and don't miss out on calls for elephants and newly published articles.
Stay informed about our posts and activities and spread the word via our social media channels.